Talk:Twilight (2008 film)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: White Shadows  It's a wonderful life 16:42, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

I'll be reviewing this for a GA as soon as I can. I said that I'll review another one too so I'll try to get them both done at the same time ;)-- White Shadows It's a wonderful life 16:42, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Criteria

 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Prose is fairly good and concise but I'd suggest a minor copy-edit just to make sure that there are not any issues that I may have missed. Once you get a copy-edit, the prose and MOS are good to go.-- White Shadows Nobody said it was easy 21:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I took a pass at copy-editing. What do you think?  Cliff smith  talk  02:20, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks good. I'll consider this part done :)-- White Shadows Nobody said it was easy 02:35, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * "It is rated 12A in the United Kingdom and Ireland." needs a source. Other than that, I see nothing else wrong.-- White Shadows Nobody said it was easy 21:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. Chaos Master Chat 02:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * No change needed here :)-- White Shadows Nobody said it was easy 21:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * No change needed here.-- White Shadows Nobody said it was easy 21:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * The article is stable now that semi-protection has been put into place. No action required.-- White Shadows It's a wonderful life 17:10, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain':
 * All images are ok.-- White Shadows Nobody said it was easy 21:14, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * Passed-- White Shadows' Nobody said it was easy 02:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I have an issue with the images. The one of Edward and Bella just shows them in a meadow. Is a non-free image needed to depict people laying in a meadow? The other image is claimed to be someone's own work but the image is published on several other websites before the user uploaded it to wikipedia. No offense to the uploader but I found the image here here here here plus a few others. --Peppage tlk 18:11, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * You make a point. Chaos, can you just remove them so this GA can keep on rolling?-- White Shadows Nobody said it was easy 23:39, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't think the first image (the meadow) is a problem. The second, though, I can easlily just put correct "tags" on them. What should I use though? I'll fix them so there can be no further issues. Chaos Master Chat 01:07, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I've removed that last image to pass this GAN. Good job! I'd suggest that you keep that image off of the article until you can confirm that it is in the PD ;)-- White Shadows Nobody said it was easy 02:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)