Talk:Twinject

is the press release in the "Canada" section relevant to the article?

 * The Canada section appears to unbalance the article and most of it is not needed and could be better served with a link to a reliable source. Not sure that the retail price is encyclopedic. I would suggest that most of the content in pruned out. Another minor point the article lead reads that this is an article about a trademark although it appears to be about a medical product, perhaps consider re-writting the lead to make that clear. The article also appears to give medical advice and guidance on how to operate the device, note this an encylcopedia and is not a substitute for a guide book or instruction leaflet or to give medical advice, I would suggest dossage, contraindications, usage and storage sections should be deleted. MilborneOne (talk) 21:47, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The whole article seems overly commercial to me. Martin Hogbin (talk) 23:43, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Given that no one seems to be objecting to a re-write, why did you open an RfC instead of just fixing it? WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC)