Talk:Twinz

Pointless information
This type of content is not added to every article about a music artist. "This X group/rapper first appeared on X's album in XXXX". That's just stupid. Tasc0 It's a zero! 23:24, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It's entirely relevant to add information about a group's appearances on other artists' recordings. This is the subject of plenty of discographical works, both paper and online, and I fail to see why you are so adamant about it not being included here. Chubbles (talk) 16:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Because is worthless. Tasc0 It's a zero! 22:38, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

thats stupid its useful to me made me give them a listen —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.163.248 (talk) 18:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Clearly a little knowledge does not hurt, yes you do not have to list every song they appeared in; but at least notable songs.~wefunkGfunk (talk) 13:40, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't see how this song is notable. Is it even a single? Tasc0 It's a zero! 00:40, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Hm, you know what. If anything, then it most likely would belong on a trivia section of the article.~wefunkGfunk (talk) 19:00, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Perfectly apt in the main narrative of the article. Chubbles (talk) 02:36, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't agree with none of you both. This information should be removed. Trivias don't follow the Wikipedia policy. Tasc0 It's a zero! 23:04, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


 * It's certainly nice to see that Tasc0 has been banned from this website. I had a similar 'discussion' with Tasc0 over the exact same sentence (In 1997 the duo appeared on Warren G's second album...). As we can see he isn't the best at having a reasonable debate. In fact, I was considering 'reporting him' (if there is such a thing) back when he first started an 'edit war' on this article. Instead, I decided it might be a long and complicated process and probably wasn't worth my time, win or lose. Therefore I simply stopped visiting Wikipedia to contribute or edit pages. About a year and a half later I decided to return to contributing to Wikipedia, although as someone who creates or starts new pages. Anyway I'm pleased that all this time later my one sentence has been reinstated into the article, especially since the article in general is quite brief and could use lot's of beefing up. Thanks to Chubbles. Cheers, Qlazarus (talk) 07:43, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * He was incredibly difficult to deal with. Sadly, his spirit lives on in others, so if you are hoping to come back to editing without constant niggling dispute, you'll probably be disappointed. But best of luck editing in any case. Chubbles (talk) 13:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)