Talk:Twitter/GA4

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Multiple orange tags have persisted on this article. The "Society", "Technology and security", and "Appearance and features" sections in particularly are woefully out of date, and many sections either go into excessive or not enough detail. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 01:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Out of the 4 tags in the article, 2 were added less than 29 days ago and 1 was added without explanation. I don't see anything egregiously excessive at first glance. - LilySophie (talk) 11:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * "Not enough detail" shouldn't be a reason for delisting; the coverage just needs to be broad, not deep. I have no opinion on other issues, or whether this article merits delisting. DFlhb (talk) 13:04, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @ElijahPepe It has been 18 days since this was opened. Any further comments? PerryPerryD  Talk To Me 20:30, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

The article does not mention Stan Twitter, and Black Twitter is only mentioned as a See also link. I know this article is long, but I think those two subjects deserve one or two sentences. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 07:04, 6 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, this GAR has been open for three months. Please keep or delist the article (although with an important article like this I would have recommended a community reassessment). AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:33, 9 January 2023 (UTC)