Talk:Two-hander

Comments
I.... think this page would be better suited as a re-direct to Wiktionary. Does anyone else agree? Murdersaurusrex (talk) 04:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed TygerKrash (talk) 16:48, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * No agreement, but this article needs expansion and inline citations.--DThomsen8 (talk) 19:43, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

"Almost" instances
What makes something an "almost" two-hander? Is it being mostly a two-hander but with a minor appearance from a third person (or more)? Or is it a three-hander? I ask because "Episode 7202" has been added, which I had already decided not to add myself because it's a definite three-hander with three main cast, and I decided it didn't fit in. Should it be removed? Any others that should be removed? Anemone Projectors  10:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Home and Away recently had a two-hander, which featured an appearance by a baby at the end. I'd consider that an "almost" two-hander, but "Episode 7202" shouldn't be listed. Maybe there could be a separate section about three-handers? Not sure if it's notable enough for a separate article. - JuneGloom07    Talk  16:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

National variety of English
I don't see anything tagging the article for a specific variety and can't think of a particularly convincing argument that there is a strong national tie. Thus, we should be defaulting to the first established.

The earliest versions of the article do not use anything characteristic in the text (programme vs. program, handling of group nouns, etc.) and there is inconsistent use of date order in the references section. The first thing I can see that pops up in the actual text of the article is "programme" in 2011. It's been there ever since. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 19:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)