Talk:Two Birds (Awake)

At Swim With Two Birds
Is it worth a mention that it seems to be referencing At Swim With Two Birds by Flann O'Brien...or is that OR--137.204.39.141 (talk) 17:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC)?

Will the real COPYVIO Please Stand-up?
My COPYVIO deletion was undone and I was threatened with a 3 month ban! But when I was trying to restore deleted material that was claimed to be COPYVIO... just making notes on the demise of Wikipedia here in case anyone is ever trying to see how and where it all went to blank.!68.37.29.229 (talk) 17:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I deleted the extensive plot. Normally, I would not think of disturbing someone else's work but due to a dispute that began in episode guide The Real Housewives of New Jersey, and the way that questions were handled there I think that attention needs to be drawn to the REAL COPYVIO and that is derivative plot descriptions that are more than a few sentences. Just for the record, I asked nicely more than once for them to back-off. Instead, people get blocked and banned and it was not even allowed to be discussed. 68.37.29.229 (talk) 16:46, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Please study plot and COPYVIO and derivatives. I've already posted the links before but I was ignored and banned so I don't feel like doing all of the work again. I am correct but politics rules the day around here I guess-(the downfall of Wikipedia).17:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)68.37.29.229 (talk)
 * Nope I wrote that summary myself. You just copyed a summary from a website violation copyright guidelines. Mine was wrote myself not a violation. TBrandley 16:50, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Sorry that you still do not understand that re-writing someone else's plot is a COPYVIO as spelled-out here on Wikipedia (derivative). I posted links explaining it to you before.68.37.29.229 (talk) 16:55, 15 September 2012 (UTC) FYI, "copied" not "copyed". 68.37.29.229 (talk) 17:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC) And just because you were slapped with COPYVIO for pasting promotional content in episode guides, AND you were unable to defend yourself, does not mean that "it"-(using verbatim, word-for-word, NON FREE content), is a COPYVIO. What you and others advised me to do, (create my "own" plot synopsis as was done here), is IN FACT, COPYVIO. (again, "derivative"). Why was my "bold" edit which pertained to COPYVIO, undone, and not only that I was THREATENED with a three month BAN! if I fixed it again? Why not just fix the violation by keeping the plot synopsis to a few hundred words?68.37.29.229 (talk) 17:13, 15 September 2012 (UTC) Refrence: WP:TVPLOT "...As the Wikipedia servers are located in the U.S. state of Florida, Wikipedia articles must conform to U.S. copyright laws. It has been held in a number of court cases that any work which re-tells original ideas from a fictional source, in sufficient quantity without adding information about that work, or in some way analysing and explaining it, may be construed as a derivative work or a copyright violation...Information about copyright fictional worlds and plots of works of fiction can be provided only under a claim of fair use, and Wikipedia's fair-use policy holds that "the amount of copyrighted work used should be as little as possible "..." (copied from WP). There is a fair plot description at the top of the article. Just because you have space designated "PLOT"-does not mean that the entire plot with all of the details, (or ANY of the details!), should be included. If THAT is how you want things done, (the violation of someone's copyrights by posting unauthorized derivative plot synopsis-"COPYVIO"), well then, maybe you should not get so heavy-handed when other editors are doing things differently such as using Non free content with permission from the copyright holder? As a matter of fact, were you the person who insisted that text could not be considered "non free content"? It is on my talk page and whoever it was posted that to me incorrectly and never came back to admit that they were incorrect.68.37.29.229 (talk) 17:32, 15 September 2012 (UTC) Now I am going to make a BOLD edit again, and delete the "plot". Instead-of banning and blocking me, I suggest you do something productive and FIX it so that it is not COPYVIO.68.37.29.229 (talk) 17:32, 15 September 2012 (UTC)