Talk:Two Cars in Every Garage and Three Eyes on Every Fish/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. In general, it looks very good and I don't see any major problems. I have a few quibbles.
 * In the section that Darwin's photo appears, Darwin is not mentioned. I believe that the justification for a pic is that it is discussed in the adjoining text, even if the pix is PD.
 * Added a mention of Darwin.


 * I don't think you clearly explain that the three eyed fish is thought to be a result of mutations caused by toxic waste from the plant, and that Bart is trying to justify the fish and defend the plant by saying that is is the result of evolution as explained by Darwin.
 * I'm not really sure what you mean. All of the stuff you said above is mentioned in the plot section...


 * Otherwise, I am impressed with the thoroughness with which you have covered this topic. Regards, &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 18:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! :)  The Le ft orium  21:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

Very interesting article. I had no idea that the Simpsons covered so many culturally relevant issues. Congratulations!
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows the relevant MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable  c (OR): No OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): Covers the major areas b (focused): Remains focused on the topic
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: Neutral
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.: Stable
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Some question if Darwin is mentioned enough in the section containing his photograph, but not enough of an issue to hold up GA
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Some question if Darwin is mentioned enough in the section containing his photograph, but not enough of an issue to hold up GA
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 22:43, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for taking a look! :)  The Le ft orium  09:28, 13 June 2009 (UTC)