Talk:Two Guys Naked in a Hot Tub

Differences in episode name
I noticed that the heading says "Two Guys Naked in a Hot Tub" whereas below it says "Two Guys Butt Naked in a Hot Tub". Which one is correct? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matthew850 (talk • contribs).

Edvard Munch
Edgar Munch? Edgar? His name is Edvard, i will change that.--80.121.9.160 (talk) 09:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Uncited material and other references
Cites?
 * The reporter's name is "Derek Smalls," a reference to This is Spinal Tap.
 * The leader of the ATF is named after Las Vegas entertainer Danny Gans.
 * The scenes with the ATF are a reference to the Branch Davidian incident at Waco, Texas.
 * Edvard Munch's painting "The Scream" is hanging above the bed where the kids are watching TV.

This is largely redundant; Its either mentioned elsewhere in the main article or not really relevant. Alastairward (talk) 15:18, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Features the party which Mrs. Cartman and the Broflovskis attend, referenced in the previous episode.
 * Kyle shows up at the end in his Jewbilee uniform, telling Stan he has to tell him about what happened to him that night; however, viewers don't find out until the next episode.
 * The Marshes come straight to the party from dropping Shelley off in the previous episode.
 * When the ATF are looking through binoculars, Mrs. Cartman is talking to Eric on the phone.
 * The music played during the party is the background music of Cartman's "Wild Wild West" rap at the beginning and end of the previous episode.


 * The scenes with the ATF are a reference to the Branch Davidian incident at Waco, Texas.


 * Watch the episode. I will quote that episode:


 * "This is what we did in Waco, play really bad music really loud until it drives them nuts"


 * At least that much is relevant and it is in fact part of the episode. AznWarlord (talk) 18:30, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


 * To prove I'm not antagonizing you, I have removed faulty information as well. I've discovered plenty of information that is not true, or otherwise chronologically out of order, and I've corrected it.


 * The difference is, I watch the episode as I go along, and I'm not using memory to provide the information. I'm getting it directly from the episode. So you have no right to remove the revisions I've made because its not cited. You might as well delete the entire plot summary. AznWarlord (talk) 19:02, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * What does it matter whether you remember or write it down as you watch the episode. The Waco seige reference you made, what of it? Its pretty self explanatory. All you're doing is repeating part of the plot summary, essentially saying "this guy said this". Alastairward (talk) 19:12, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Isn't that the whole article? A combination of the interpretation of the episode by each individual of an entire community put together into one article? A giant mass created by multiple individuals writing down their interpretation of how "this guy said this" for the entire world to read? AznWarlord (talk) 21:03, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * "A combination of the interpretation of the episode by each individual"? Quite the opposite, the source for the plot of each TV article is the episode itself. So you're merely supposed to tell us what is on screen, no interpretation, no speculation, just precisely what you see on screen. Alastairward (talk) 21:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC)


 * As it is now the reference to ATF (and presumably Waco) is pretty cryptic to anyone outside the USA (and the younger generations anywhere), and there is no mention of why they suddenly show up Hugo999 (talk) 09:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Although this post is almost 3 years old now, I think it's worth pointing out that there are certain things that South Park does that references home affairs that aren't necessarily obvious to visitors abroad, but the ATF and Waco siege would be one of the more well known matters.Eug.galeotti (talk) 01:53, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Melvin: Explain what is means
For some reason, "Melvin" is inexplicably added to the description of characters Stan does not want to associate with. Apparently it is some sort of internet slang, but that does not explain it's origins or justify its use in a community encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.192.25.176 (talk) 02:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)