Talk:Twos (Enneagram of Personality)

NPOV Issues
As with all the other articles for each Enneagram personality type, the Twos article only represents one particular school of Enneagram of Personality teaching and seems to have been written in order to promote that school's teachings. This is not acceptable for an encyclopedia article.

I would have the same attitude if the articles were biased towards another Enneagram school's theoretical approach

All these articles require radical editing to articulate a more consensual understanding of Enneagram of Personality teachings - and also to become acceptable according to Wikipedia standards and policies. Ontologicos 10:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't think it's fair to attribute motives to the writers of the article. It's quite possible that they wrote about the only school of Enneagram teaching that they're aware of. I'd encourage others who are knowledgeable in this area to add other points of view, or even a short paragraph indicating which school of thought is covered, and which schools are not. And if anyone can provide references, please do! ThreeOfCups (talk) 00:04, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Riso & Hudson's 'Levels'
I have added an introduction to the 'levels of development' section to clarify that this teaching comes from the Riso and Hudson school of thought. Further clarification may be useful.

I felt the introduction was more appropriate at present than radically editing or deleting the section altogether.

I will appreciate other people's views on how to best proceed with editing the Enneatype articles along NPOV lines. Ontologicos 11:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Possible Examples
I have deleted the lists of possible examples as these can only ultimately be speculative and not objectively factual - and therefore are not adequate for inclusion in encyclopedia articles. If anyone disagrees with their removal please discuss first. Thanks. Ontologicos 10:35, 18 October 2007 (UTC)