Talk:Tychonoff plank

Capital-Omega
I've not seen cap-Omega used for the first uncountable ordinal. I'm used to seeing 'Omega-sub-1'. Can anyone give a citation for the notation used in the article as it is now? If not I suggest we use the standard (afaik) notation. Thanks. Zero sharp (talk) 22:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * ok I leaped before I looked, I see now it's following Steen and Seebach, and since this is a topological context that makes sense. nevermind! Zero sharp (talk) 22:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)