Talk:Tyler Summitt

Possible ref
http://www.shreveporttimes.com/article/20140401/SPORTS0203/304010016/Tyler-Summitt-will-take-over-Techsters?nclick_check=1 -- S Philbrick (Talk)  22:41, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your contribution, but that is a dead link now. God bless and happy editing! MarydaleEd (talk) 23:22, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Vandalism Incoming
With the news about his scandal and resignation, should the page be semi-protected for a short time to prevent a flood of vandalous edits? MichaelXX2 (talk) 01:24, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject United States High Importance -- is this an error?
How does this article rate High Importance by WikiProject United States? is this a mistake? --Crunch (talk) 21:52, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Article Complete
I have edited this article from top to bottom and can confirm that any information that should be in this article at this time has been included and it is all properly sourced. As of today, this is a well-written, properly sourced article that meets all of Wikipedia standards. Let's ensure it remains that way! God bless and happy editing. MarydaleEd (talk) 23:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I was so proud yesterday as I completed a full edit of this article and brought it to the point that it met all Wikipedia standards. I left this article so well done that, however small, it could be an article by which others could be measured. I have no interest in this subject or this article other than my determination to bring as many Wikipedia articles as I can up to Wikipedia standard. It has been vandalized three times since last night. I encourage editors to make good-faith edits and please contribute to Wikipedia in a positive way. God bless and happy editing. MarydaleEd (talk) 17:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * There were a number of grammar errors I fixed for you. I also fixed a claim that wasn't supported by the sources. Since you felt the need to insert your own commentary on the previous edits, I'll insert mine. I'm not sure Wikipedia is well served by bragging about how good your contributions are, specifically when they are full of mistakes. Your friend in Christ, 104.128.171.63 at 22:04 10 April 2021‎ (UTC). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.128.171.63 (talk)
 * Thank you for your contributions and the corrections you made. Exchanging the word "helps" for "works" is correct, not because of what it implies, but because it is the word used by the source. That was a good catch. I fear you misunderstood me or perhaps I should have been more perspicuous in making my point. My intention was not to boast of my edits, but to express how proud I was to bring to completion the collaborative effort of the article, and that at that moment it fully met Wikipedia standards. Of course, Wikipedia articles evolve and people change. I see you corrected a typographical error I made in haste. I don't make grammatical errors, but occasionally I will move so quickly through an article that I leave a typo, so I appreciate you correcting the misplaced comma. I should be more careful. Perhaps you were put off by my comment about vandalism. It is true that vandalism frustrates me because I have so much respect for dedicated Wikipedia editors who spend a lot of time and effort researching and editing. Perhaps my sensitivity caused me to be harsh in my comment, but I will always discourage vandalism. Otherwise, I am always respectful to legitimate Wikipedia editors and give them the benefit of the doubt, even if I find their opinions don't mesh with mine. I've never regretted doing so. Again, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. God bless and happy editing! MarydaleEd (talk) 23:59, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Missing a comma between two independent clauses is a grammatical error. Your friend in Christ, 104.128.171.63

Divorce date
When you look at this article there is conflicting info over when he and his first wife got divorced. Was it the year his mother died or the year after? 2601:702:4202:11E0:AD8A:6B94:E486:FA62 (talk) 16:39, 27 August 2022 (UTC)