Talk:Tyler Thigpen/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Kaiser matias (talk) 22:11, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Kaiser matias (talk) 22:11, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Kaiser matias (talk) 22:11, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Peer review or none, I love it that there are Dolphin dorks that edited this page the moment he was traded. Hilarious. And I did keep this opinion to the talk page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.77.142.23 (talk) 03:51, 30 September 2009 (UTC)