Talk:Type (designation)

Narrow scope
Although the article's title simply mentions "designation" and the introduction notes that "Many other nations use the word 'Type' to designate products in a series" with no further qualification, the article is devoted to a discussion of (1) military weaponry (2) from three countries only. Either this article should be greatly expanded (admittedly, a huge job) or its title changed to a more restrictive scope, such as "Type (military designation)" or "Type (weapons)". The latter may be more appropriate. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 15:59, 11 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Expansion seems to me the answer. As for the article name, I took Mark (designation) as the model. Binksternet (talk) 16:23, 11 December 2009 (UTC)