Talk:Type 035 submarine

Requested move 10 July 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Unfortunately no consensus for the move has emerged. It could be prudent to participate in a centralised discussion to establish a guideline for Chinese submarine naming or even naming of ships in general. (non-admin closure) &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:32, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Type 035 submarine → Ming-class submarine – Rename to NATO name, as is common with other submarine pages such as the Akula, Typhoon, and more. Following WP:TITLE for Consistency and Use commonly recognizable names. Skjoldbro (talk) 18:02, 10 July 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Seraphim System  ( talk ) 21:52, 18 July 2018 (UTC) ,
 * Support-for Consistency and Use commonly recognizable names.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 10:17, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment I checked other similar discussions and have seen more opposition and generally low participation. I have relisted some of those discussions already and am reluctant to move one page for consistency when there is opposition in other similar discussions. I think it would be better to have this discussion in one place, but I've relisted for now since the discussions are already open. Seraphim System  ( talk ) 21:52, 18 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment : this should be a grouped request and discussion with Talk:Type 096 submarine and Talk:Type 039A submarine. 83.228.159.212 (talk) 16:05, 20 July 2018 (UTC).
 * Oppose for now. See WT:AT. Andrewa (talk) 22:57, 25 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.