Talk:Type 1934 destroyers/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 00:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Krishna Chaitanya Velaga Can I request that this article be the next of mine (You're reviewing 3 others of mine I believe) that you review? It's the last article I need for a Good Topic. Cheers. -- Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  19:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Lead and infobox;
 * My first comment on lead is cut it down. It gives too much detail. Remove the points that are not worthy of summary. Per WP:LEADLENGTH, an article of this size (less than 15000 characters), lead must be no longer that 2 paras.
 * Link "marks" currency in infobox
 * Per MOS:DATERANGE, the year ranges must have en dashes.
 * Link the units in infobox; waterline, standard load, overall, design load, nautical miles etc.
 * The descriptions of values in infobox like Overall, At waterline, Maximum speed etc. must not have initial capitals. Just "overall", "at waterline" etc.
 * Section 1;
 * abbreviate the units from second mention, all through the article
 * Everything looks fine. Just a few links are to made for the units on first mention.
 * Section 1.1;
 * After their ship "the" trials
 * "1938-1939" use en dash
 * Inconsistent usage of conversion template; "114m (374 ft)" "114.4 metres (375 ft)"; fix it
 * "1940-1942" en dash
 * Section 2;
 * What is "steel 51"? Link if possible, else provide a foot note.
 * "54,749,000 Marks" remove initial capitals from currency
 * Two of the ships
 * 10 "November" and 25 November
 * on 2 "January" and 7 January
 * 242-245; use en dash
 * sailed to Swinemünde to have her damage "to get" repaired
 * Comma after "After this"
 * Link "North Sea"
 * Put italics on "Kriegsmarine"
 * Please be consistent on "World War II" and "Second World War". Also link it on the first mention.
 * and other destroyers; better be specific on this, the phrase "other destroyers" seems vague, it doesn't clearly whether they're the destroyers of this class or other German destroyers. Please recheck the usage over entire paragraph.
 * NO plagiarism found, image OK.
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:00, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done. Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  05:41, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Everything looks fine. But please cut the down the lead a bit. It is not about the paras, but about the size in general. No reader will be interested to read too much in the lead. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 06:21, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I've cut it down significantly. -- Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  07:19, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey, looks great. Everything is quite OK. But see there is some referencing error. It is being displayed at the end of the page. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 07:49, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Fixed; I had forgot to tell the footnote where to go. -- Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  07:53, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * on 2 "January" and 7 January
 * 242-245; use en dash
 * sailed to Swinemünde to have her damage "to get" repaired
 * Comma after "After this"
 * Link "North Sea"
 * Put italics on "Kriegsmarine"
 * Please be consistent on "World War II" and "Second World War". Also link it on the first mention.
 * and other destroyers; better be specific on this, the phrase "other destroyers" seems vague, it doesn't clearly whether they're the destroyers of this class or other German destroyers. Please recheck the usage over entire paragraph.
 * NO plagiarism found, image OK.
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:00, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done. Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  05:41, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Everything looks fine. But please cut the down the lead a bit. It is not about the paras, but about the size in general. No reader will be interested to read too much in the lead. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 06:21, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I've cut it down significantly. -- Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  07:19, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey, looks great. Everything is quite OK. But see there is some referencing error. It is being displayed at the end of the page. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 07:49, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Fixed; I had forgot to tell the footnote where to go. -- Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  07:53, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * NO plagiarism found, image OK.
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:00, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done. Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  05:41, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Everything looks fine. But please cut the down the lead a bit. It is not about the paras, but about the size in general. No reader will be interested to read too much in the lead. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 06:21, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I've cut it down significantly. -- Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  07:19, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey, looks great. Everything is quite OK. But see there is some referencing error. It is being displayed at the end of the page. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 07:49, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Fixed; I had forgot to tell the footnote where to go. -- Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  07:53, 15 November 2017 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 08:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 08:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 08:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)