Talk:Type 60 Self-propelled 106 mm Recoilless Gun

Untitled
I have condensed and reworded the material from Jane's so no copyright infringement is involved.Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:30, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Original armament
That the adoptation of the M40 caused a reversal to two guns indicate it wasn't the original gun used. Is there anything in the source that tells which gun it was fitted with iin the beginning? BP OMowe (talk) 08:20, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Japanese Wikipedia says this vehicle had Type 60 vehicle mount 106 mm Recoil-less Rifle (60式車載106mm無反動砲). However, that page did not have enough source. Not a book, but this website also says too. Aizenns (talk) 11:31, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

"Auxiliary" transmission?
Is this the proper term for this? Isn't this just a secondary transmission, such as are used in heavy trucks, which doubles the number of gear ratios and allows far a low and high range of speeds? Also, does "manually elevated" mean that the operator has to manually crank the whole turret assembly up and down, or does it just mean that he has to operate a separate control to raise and lower it? I assume the former, but some more detail would be nice. And why did using the M40 "force reversion to two [rifles]"?

Idumea47b (talk) 04:48, 8 August 2020 (UTC)