Talk:Type 88 75 mm AA gun

=Loose statement about utility= This article statement is misguided in the sense of representing AA as being either effective or not "considered capable of handling any targets". If it's a matter of altitude, that should be made clear. 98.210.208.107 (talk) 02:51, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It's also a matter of time frame. When adopted, the Type 88 was a good weapon, but by the end of the war it was found to be almost completely lacking.--172.190.50.79 (talk) 22:50, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * "Lacking" what? Boneyard90 (talk) 23:22, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * How about lacking the ability to deal with the performance of 1940s aircraft. LACKING THAT!--172.190.184.240 (talk) 09:11, 3 February 2012 (UTC)