Talk:Type Ia sensory fiber

Too technical
This is too technical for me to wikify. --rbrwr&plusmn; 14:31, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I have written another article from scratch, because the original contribution was not adequate. User:Rsabbatini.

misleading with the type II axons
type II axons reports muscle length, not change in muscle length? Or am i wrong? That is at least what is written in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_II_sensory_fiber.

Maybe a bad idea to use wikipedia suorces for making wikipedia articles, but i have a feeling that i am righ here. Maybe someone that is sure could tell? In the way it is now i find the table very confusing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.241.72.216 (talk) 15:42, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

The II neurons fiber don't fire when the muscle is still, rather, they fire when the muscle is still but they actually fire even more when there is a velocity. 145.94.155.187 (talk) 19:31, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Fibers vs neurons
This article would be much clearer if the word "fiber" was changed to become "neuron" when speaking about a sensory fiber. As a student, when I think of a neuromotor-related fiber, I think of a muscle fiber. Talking about the Ia fiber makes me think of slow-twitch muscle fibers... it makes this entire article very confusing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.171.164.211 (talk) 12:09, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Function of muscle spindles
This may be a poor question. But, if, as the article states, the muscle spindle is parallel with contractile fibers then why does the image seem to depict them in series? Vokesk (talk) 22:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)