Talk:Types of Women/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Katolophyromai (talk · contribs) 17:27, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

I will review this article. I have read through it once and it seems to be a very promising candidate. --Katolophyromai (talk) 17:27, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments:
 * 1) I have re-read the article several times over and the writing quality is clearly top-notch.
 * 2) The article is well-cited and contains plenty of references.
 * 3) The article provides an extensive overview of the poem in question.
 * 4) The article has no problems with POV; all of the opinions described in the article are clearly attributed to modern scholars and are not spoken in Wikipedia's voice.
 * 5) The article is completely stable. I could find no trace of edit-warring or vandalism in the recent article history and the content of the article remains consistent from day-to-day.
 * 6) The image of the archaic figurine of the pig is an excellent addition to the article, but, if you can find an image of a Greek manuscript of the poem itself, that might be a better image to use for the main image. The pig image might fit better in the "Content" section.

Overall, I think that this article is a clear and easy pass. It thoroughly addresses all of the GA criteria. If you think I have made a mistake and this article is not yet ready, please let me know. --Katolophyromai (talk) 01:45, 27 August 2017 (UTC)