Talk:Typhoon Dan (1989)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: maclean (talk) 04:00, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * GA review (see What is a good article?)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * 2) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Two images: both WPCommons hosted, both public domain
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Two images: both WPCommons hosted, both public domain
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * Notes
 * "1-minute maximum sustained winds of 130 km/h (80 mph).[1] The JMA indicates that Dan peaked slightly afterward, with 10-minute sustained winds of 140 km/h (85 mph)" - isn't the 1-minute maximum sustained wind supposed to be higher than the 10-minute sustained wind? Which number at records this wind measurement?
 * – 075 = 75 knots = 85 mph, and the JMA uses 10-minute winds by default. In theory, 1-minute winds should be greater than 10-minute winds, but since they're recorded by different agencies, they don't always coincide. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for double checking. maclean (talk) 02:34, 30 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Ref 3 = National Disaster Coordinating Council. - does National refer to the Philippines? Perhaps the |location= parameter would be appropriate here.
 * Not sure actually. Here's their main home page, but it doesn't mention any location in particular... – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:02, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks like it is the Philippines. I added the parameter: maclean (talk) 02:34, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah its the Phillipine NDCC.Jason Rees (talk) 03:29, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks both! – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:46, 30 January 2010 (UTC)