Talk:Typhoon Durian

Philippines impact links

 * http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/11/30/asia/AS_WEA_Asia_Storm.php
 * http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/RWB.NSF/db900SID/TKAE-6VZA2S?OpenDocument&rc=3&cc=phl
 * http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/doc106?openForm&rc=3&emid=TC-2006-000175-PHL&po=0&so=63
 * New link to the Manila Bulletin article (previous one is dead)
 * 3.6 billion Philippine pesos released to Bicol (this link shouldn't die unless the site dies)
 * China (PRC) response
 * Singapore response
 * State of calamity
 * Rainfall totals map

A page-relevant wondering
I wonder if we have anyone in the tropical cyclone project that speaks the various languages spoken in the Phillipines and Vietnam. If so, they could be of tremendous help for this article. Sometimes I wonder if our project's focus on the western Hemisphere merely has to do with our understanding of English and Spanish moreso than our familiarity with TPC. I'm sure data isn't as scarce as it appears to be (to those of us that mainly speak English) for foreign countries. Thegreatdr 16:20, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Typhoon Durian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cma.gov.cn/english/News/t20071129_221742.phtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 21:08, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Unsourced content
With this edit you added content to the article without a source. Instead, you wrote "sources cited in text". Of the three sources in that text, two do not appear to link to any content, and the third does not support your edit. Are you able to add sources to support your edit? If not, will you remove your edit until you can find sources? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

I propose merging the Philippines sub-article
The Philippines sub-article is only 34 kb, and the main article is only 31 kb. The main article can easily handle the info on where the main impacts occurred. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 23:36, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Strongly Support – Per Hurricanehink. The main article doesn't have all that much content and can easily accommodate the content from the Philippines impacts article. We should not fork out content unless we absolutely have to, as it's better to keep as much information in one place as possible. Merging the two articles would consolidate the information we have on this storm and make a much stronger article.  Light and Dark2000  🌀 (talk) 01:22, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I just went ahead and merged. It's a no brainer. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 04:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC)