Talk:Typhoon Elsie (1989)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:27, 19 November 2009 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

One minor issue before I can pass it. Good work! – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:27, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Prose is generally good, except for this: "By October 15, Elise began to take a "stair-stepped" track to the west-northwest and intensified." What does "stair-stepped" mean...?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Corrected the issue, thanks for the review JC. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:06, 19 November 2009 (UTC)