Talk:Typhoon Emma (1959)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk · contribs) 23:15, 2 April 2020 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Lead

 * "Emma steadily weakened and became extratropical on November 13, the JMA ceased tracking the storm on November 15" seems awkwardly written. Maybe add "and the JMA ceased...." or "As Emma steadily weakened...."
 * Added the "and".


 * Can "tropical depression" be Wikilinked?
 * Done.

JMA

 * This could be because I am unfamiliar with Typhoons but this reference and this reference doesn't make sense to me. How can I read it to check for information?
 * Added two more notes.

Done with fixes,. Thanks for the review. Nova Crystallis  (Talk)  01:36, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Alrighty, congratulations. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 01:40, 3 April 2020 (UTC)