Talk:Typhoon Francisco (2019)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Etriusus (talk · contribs) 01:14, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

I'll be starting this GA review, it's been sitting since March. I've reviewed other pages from WikiProject Tropical cyclones, so I am familiar with their MOS. Please use a ✅, strikethrough or some other means of indicating if an issue has been resolved. I'll take care of minor CE's. Etriusus (Talk) 01:14, 26 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The review has been live for a few days now. If there is no response within the next few days, the article will auto-fail.
 * Note: Cyclonebiskit has not edited since June 22nd, approx 8 days ago as of writing.
 * Etriusus (Talk) 20:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Review has been open for one week, no reply from the nominee. Nominee has been pinged twice and Legobot's messages were also on User:Cyclonebiskit's page. User has been inactive for ~10 days in total, last editing on June 22nd. At this time article will fail review for a lack of nominee activity. Etriusus (Talk) 01:03, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Images

 * All Image rights are in order.
 * 3 are made by NASA and thus in public domain.
 * 1 was self-published by another user, reverse image search doesn't find anything noteworthy.

Copyvios

 * Earwig gives a 0.0% similarity, a new record.

Misc

 * No issues with stability noted. Only a handful of edits since 2019.

Lead

 * The info box says 150 kpm, not cited
 * 'minor impacts' specify a bit more

Meteorological history

 * MOS:SANDWICH, move image. If you run out of space for images, consider a Gallery template
 * 'insufficient divergence', link to Cyclogenesis
 * favorable conditions fostered organization, explain WP:TECHNICAL
 * "Typhoon Francisco reached its peak intensity" Later in the passage, it states "have intensified slightly", contradicting this.
 * "Maintaining this intensity," which intensity?

Preparations and impact

 * 'levels rose' rose to what?

comment: The max wind speed keeps changing. I see 140, 143, and 150. Why does the  Meteorological history section use 140 and not 143? Where did 150 come from? Maybe move A maximum wind gust of 143 km/h (89 mph) was observed at Miyazaki Airport up to the Meteorological history section. Additionally, the page is unclear if 130 kph or 140 kph is the peak strength.

Other general CEs made, placing the page on hold. Etriusus (Talk) 18:58, 27 June 2022 (UTC)