Talk:Typhoon Haikui (2012)

ITN nom
This article has been nomination for In The News; you can comment on its candidacy here. Cheers, Khazar2 (talk) 03:15, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Article title
The article has now been moved a few times between "Typhoon Haikui" and "Typhoon Haikui (2012)". The latter disambiguator is unnecessary, as Wikipedia has no other Typhoon Haikui pages. Should another typhoon be named this a decade in the future, the pages can be disambiguated then; in the meantime, WP:PRECISION seems to me to ask us to keep the title simple. Khazar2 (talk) 13:52, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

JTWC prognostic reasonings──Haikui

 * 01 // 02 // 03 // 04 // 05 // 06 // 07 // 08 // 09 // 10
 * 11 // 12 // 13 // 14 // 15 // 16 // 17 // 18 // 19 // 20

-- ✯Earth100✯  (talk✉)  05:44, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

2012 Philippine floods
2012 Philippine floods redirects to this article, but there's also 2012 Philippines flooding. Shouldn't it redirect there? —Ynhockey (Talk) 08:11, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 one external links on Typhoon Haikui. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WWJP25-RJTD_201208011200.htm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/raw/wt/wtpn21.pgtw..txt
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTPN33-PGTW_201208022100.htm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTPQ22-RJTD_201208030000.htm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTPN33-PGTW_201208040300.htm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTPQ22-RJTD_201208051200.htm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/shanghai-east-china-braces-typhoon-haikui-16945073

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:11, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 23 October 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Requester was CheckUser blocked (non-admin closure) — Andy W. ( talk ) 02:49, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Typhoon Haikui → Typhoon Haikui (2012) – Name was not retired yet, see Typhoon Sanba (2012) N-C16 (talk) 04:00, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Support per nomination. &mdash;Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 04:37, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Oppose It's the only usage of the storm. YE Pacific  Hurricane 13:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 13 November 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved Fuortu (talk) 11:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Typhoon Haikui → Typhoon Haikui (2012) – Although this is the only storm of this name, the name is not retired yet, and this storm is not very notable that can be a primary topic. 203.186.21.99 (talk) 05:43, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * No, that's not how it works. It was the only storm of the name, so it doesn't need a year identifier. It doesn't matter if it is the primary topic or not. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 15:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose There was an RfC about this very issue, which argues in favor of the current title. P p p er y 18:37, 13 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.