Talk:Typhoon Meranti (2004)

Merge?
This storm didn't affect anyone :/ We don't do these sorts of articles anymore. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 01:49, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Merge (2nd)
This storm didn't cause any impacts, pinging the main editors of the article. --219.78.191.189 (talk) 12:59, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Merge to 2004 Pacific typhoon season
This storm didn't affect anyone. Also, this storm didn't cause any impacts. So I suggest to merge. 126.255.254.199 (talk) 22:34, 4 December 2022 (UTC)


 * ✅ I merged it. 126.237.93.109 (talk) 23:50, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The merge has been reverted. I suggest you give the editors a chance to have their say. M.Bitton (talk) 23:56, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * (Reply for M.Bitton) OK, I understood. However, I have sought out opinions from others from the beginning. I think it is need to prove the need to leave an article for Typhoon Meranti in 2004. 126.161.75.79 (talk) 13:09, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Does this mean that this article has been selected as a good article and should be kept? However, this article was selected as a good article in 2009 (more than 10 years ago), and it is highly likely that the situation has changed. Should I reassessment of good article first? 126.161.75.79 (talk) 13:15, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure which situation you're referring to (expecting it to have changed), given that the article is about a past event. M.Bitton (talk) 21:59, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose merge, as readers are not served by the consolidation; the existing article is supported by references; it is the case that typhoons of the period retain article elsewhere - see Category:Tropical cyclones in 2004. Klbrain (talk) 03:38, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose - This is a good-quality article, detailed, and provides more information than the section in the article could give. There's no reason to merge it. SolarisPenguin (talk) 08:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge, as it does not follow WP:NWX guidelines. The season page has had the same text in the storm's own section since this edit. luis  💬 21:42, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge – As the creator of this article, I don't believe its existence is warranted anymore. It doesn't meet our current notability guidelines for tropical cyclone sub-articles. The information can be easily condensed and merged into the main article with little to no lost content. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 20:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge - Per merge arguments. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)