Talk:Typhoon Nangka (2015)

Merger proposal
IMO this article should not exist but to merge into the season article/2015 PTS article. This is because of short information within the article and citations. Also there are many storms which make landfall over a country and have significant damages which do not have an article like Typhoons Songda in 2004. What do you guys think? Typhoon2013 (talk) 06:42, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose because it clearly meets WP:GNG.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:52, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Songda honestly needs an article, but that has nothing to do with Nangka. Pretty sure there's enough possible content for a stand alone article here. YE Pacific  Hurricane 07:06, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd give it a bit more time, but this doesn't seem to be an exceptional storm when it comes to its behavior. As a result, I don't think a Meteorological history-dominated article will do, so I suggest that rather than opposing a merge and leaving the article in its current not-so-great state, expand the Preparations and impact section. Dustin  ( talk ) 15:56, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Either could work. I mean the storm did last two weeks, even though it's MH was nothing atypical. But It's likely more viable to add impact. YE Pacific  Hurricane 16:19, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I added some Marianas Islands stuff, upped it to start. Definitely should not be merged. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 03:40, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose merge per WP:GNG, as brought up by Jasper. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 07:04, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok. Keep the article. I will remove the merge sign at the top of the article. Typhoon2013  (talk) 20:50, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

I've worked on the article for the past few days. It's borderline notable enough, but I've found enough info to justify keeping it. I rated it as B-class for now, pending JMA's final BT, any NCDC report, or any additional report from Japan. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:22, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Importance
Now that the article is done, is this more low importance? ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 05:13, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I went with low, given the low damage. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 15:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * IMO it looks like that this article is at GA rating. From me merging this article to keeping this article with a higher rating than C, impressive! Typhoon2013  (talk) 08:58, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I just gotta wait for any additional potential info. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 12:09, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Typhoon Nangka (2015). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.prh.noaa.gov/data/GUM/HLSPQ3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:41, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Typhoon Matmo (2014) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 02:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)