Talk:Typhoon Wipha (2007)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hello I will be reviewing your article very soon. Bobby122  Contact Me   (C)  21:41, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:  Sources are cited regularly through the article, but three of the links are dead. See my comment below.
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Reviewer: Bobby122   Contact Me   (C)  22:54, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I've made an effort to shorten and condense the lead. Juliancolton (talk) 00:40, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Unless you want to cut out an entire portion of the lead, it's probably as short as it should be. Thanks for getting to this JC, I completely forgot about it :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 00:59, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I have just re-reviewed your article and have found one more issue. Three of your reference links are dead, the dead links are reference 37, 40 and 31. These links need to be repaired or replaced if possible because they are needed to back up what is in those lines. Once they are fixed I believe that the article will qualify as a good article. Bobby122  Contact Me   (C)  05:32, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I've done what I could to replace the links, two of them no longer exist so some info was lost. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 11:57, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The reviewer hasn't edited in some time, so it probably needs another reviewer to finish this up. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 03:06, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * That I'll do myself, actually. Reviewing now. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 22:34, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't see any further issues aside from what was mentioned above, so I'll pass the article. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 23:51, 18 August 2010 (UTC)