Talk:Tzachas/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (talk · contribs) 21:33, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Give me a little time to go over the article.--Tomandjerry211 (Let's have a chat) 21:33, 26 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi User:Tomandjerry211, sorry for the delay, I only just now saw your review. On the points you raised:

Thanks for taking the time to review this, I am awaiting further feedback. Cheers, Constantine  ✍  09:04, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * "First paragraph in the body should be a note." I disagree, it discusses the sources on his life, and is directly pertinent to the "Life" section.
 * "1090/91" means in 1090 or 1091, it is a common shorthand e.g. in the case of the sources using the Islamic calendar, where years do not coincide with the Western calendar. 1090 and 1091 would be 1090–91, which is how I've denoted the regnal dates.
 * "It is unecessary to put the same citations over and over again right next themselves in the article" I am not sure what you mean
 * I mean some thing like this: "The T30 HMC served in World War II. It later served in the First Indochina War. ", this is unecessary to do.--Tomandjerry211 (Let's have a chat) 10:53, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, you mean in the second paragraph. You're right, I've removed the one redundant set. Constantine  ✍  12:52, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Not really, I mean it could, but there is no firm rule. I prefer to keep it simple with this one.
 * Fixed dead link, Brill keeps moving its articles around.
 * On splitting the article, there is really not that much info for it to be necessary. Having one-paragraph sections merely to have sections is rather beside the point.
 * All Anatolian Turks were Oghuz Turks.
 * Passing, Well done!--Tomandjerry211 (Let's have a chat) 14:48, 20 June 2015 (UTC)