Talk:U-1 class submarine (Austria-Hungary)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * Prose
 * A few issues, all minor
 * "after allowing the navies of other countries to pioneer submarine developments, in 1904 ordered the Austrian Naval Technical Committee (MTK) to produce a submarine design."
 * "in 1904" is out of place.
 * Reworded to avoid awkward phrasing
 * "When the Navy rejected the January 1905 MTK design and other designs submitted as part of a public competition as impracticable"
 * One longgg part of a sentence...
 * Split and reworded
 * What is the "MTK design"?
 * the design from the Austrian Naval Technical Committee, or MTK, referred to in the previous sentence.
 * Sorry, that was me being dumb. :) — Ed   17  (Talk /  Contribs)  19:58, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Random
 * Do you really have to cite the same refs twice in the first para of "Service Career"?
 * The first one should have been for Conway's and has been changed.
 * Can we get a ref for the submerged speed (I'm assuming that it is Conway's...?)
 * I think I got this changed(?)
 * Yep! — Ed   17  (Talk /  Contribs)  19:58, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm putting it on hold, but I'm not really worried that these won't get done. Yet another excellent article from you, Bellhalla! :) — Ed   17  (Talk /  Contribs)  16:04, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review and the comments. My replies to your concerns are interspersed above. — Bellhalla (talk) 19:47, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Perfect! Easy pass! — Ed   17  (Talk /  Contribs)  19:58, 4 December 2008 (UTC)