Talk:U-tube

Hatnote
I'm aware of the history. I don't see the need for a hatnote on such a small dab, as it's what dabs are for and perfectly handled in the see also per WP:MOSDAB (which also says hatnotes are ok). I object to that edit, so please make your case, or gain consensus. Widefox ; talk 23:11, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Uh, what? It's a clear case for a . It does not have any relevance as a "see also". You seem to misunderstand the Universal Tube case. Not only is it relevant because of the litigation, it's relevant because people genuinely search for "utube" and intend to find YouTube. MOSDAB doesn't address this. As the status quo is to use a dablink, I suggest that you make a case for your proposed change. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 03:24, 9 March 2014 (UTC)