Talk:U.S. Fencing Competitions

talk here Andmarsh (talk) 13:45, 25 October 2021 (UTC) The organization of the article is very easy to follow, and makes it easy for the user to find information relevant to what they are searching for. Sometimes information is assumed. For instance, under 'Divisions' there is some clarification needed for 'fencers of ratings{}' The 'Youth' section could be expanded more, the notation used is a little difficult to comprehend. Might want to explain what 'epee','sabre', and 'foil' are briefly or add an internal link to other wikipedia articles. The most important change should be expanding on more sections for clarity. Might also want to add internal links and citations (Maybe some photos too)Alexm906 (talk) 14:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

-The article has good organization and framework, it flows through the fencing competition process pretty well. I see you have a planned section for how points work and I think that additional background will help the article a lot in terms of trying to facilitate someone with an entry level or no knowledge of fencing reading your article. Also linking other relevant fencing articles will help readers overcome the knowledge barrier. You may want to expand on the rating system because it is referenced a few times without any in depth explanation. Iobal (talk) 14:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)