Talk:U.S. Route 1/9 Truck/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk)  11:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * A few small, things, but nothing a copyedit can't solve.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * You know that you can use the variable "work" for the newspaper in cite news, making it automatically in italics. The issue that is important, is that the two last references lack a title. I'm not quite sure what the title should be (since I know little about US law), so could you please add them.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I will pass the article as good, under the condition that the one issue regarding titles for the two refs are fixed up. To be a bit frank, the last paragraph almost seems a bit out-of-place, and I would not complain if the last paragraph (about the definition of a truck) was removed, while it is okay if it remains too. Arsenikk (talk)  11:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I will pass the article as good, under the condition that the one issue regarding titles for the two refs are fixed up. To be a bit frank, the last paragraph almost seems a bit out-of-place, and I would not complain if the last paragraph (about the definition of a truck) was removed, while it is okay if it remains too. Arsenikk (talk)  11:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I will pass the article as good, under the condition that the one issue regarding titles for the two refs are fixed up. To be a bit frank, the last paragraph almost seems a bit out-of-place, and I would not complain if the last paragraph (about the definition of a truck) was removed, while it is okay if it remains too. Arsenikk (talk)  11:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)


 * After reading it, it did seem very out of place, so I removed it and I fixed the lone ref missing a title. Also, I don't know how to work templates that well, so how do you fix that? Mitch 32(The Password is... See here!) 12:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Congratulations with a good article :) Arsenikk (talk)  23:34, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * What I do with cite news templates is the following variables: "url" (if online), "title" (title of article), "work" (newspaper or magazine), "last" (last name of author), "first" (first name of author), "author" (full name of author if multiple authors, use instead of last and first), "authorlink" (wikilink to author, only if they have an article on Wikipedia), "pages" (page number if printed edition), "accessdate" (for online newspapers) and "language" (for non-English papers). For the sake of "work", it will automatically put it in italics. Hope that answered the question. Arsenikk (talk)  23:34, 29 October 2009 (UTC)