Talk:U.S. Route 1/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 23:46, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

 Looking at the article, there are several major issues that would take more than a week to fix. In addition, it appears the nominator is not a major contributor to the article. Therefore, I will have to fail it. The article may be renominated once the issues are addressed.  Dough 48  72  23:46, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Could use a decent copyedit. There are many poorly-written sentences such as "In Florida until the 1990s, U.S. 1 used high-contrast markers (white text on a red background)", "Through Rockingham, it goes through downtown with a bypass in the future plans.", and "Through Penns Neck is a series of traffic signals. "
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The article has a few uncited statements, including "Moreover, NCDOT is planning to finish four laning US 1 in Richmond County past NC 177 with a Rockingham bypass to the east. There are no plans from SCDOT to widen US 1 from the state line. From Henderson into Virginia, U.S. 1 runs parallel with I-85 as a two-lane local road until the state line where Virginia hosts a continuous third center lane for alternate passing towards US Highway 58 before South Hill.", "As it enters Greenwich, Connecticut, it continues as a two lane local road.", "Brickell Avenue is the name given to the stretch of U.S. Route 1 in Miami, Florida just south of the Miami River."
 * Several references need to be formatted properly.
 * Reference 21 is a dead link.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The route description contains historical information that would be better suited for the history section.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail: