Talk:U.S. Route 1 Business (Trenton, New Jersey)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 15:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * Quality of the article is good.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Article complies with MoS.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * Good.
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * See comment section. Issue fixed.
 * C. No original research:
 * No original research found.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Article covers all major aspects about the topic.
 * B. Focused:
 * Article remains focused throughout.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No bias found.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * Article is stable.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are tagged correctly.
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Images are included, appropriate, and have suitable captions.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * See comment section. Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 17:57, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments

 * Reference number 4 doesn't seem to be working. This needs to be fixed before I can pass the article.

Everything else is good but the article will be on hold for 7 days in order to fix reference number 4.--Dom497 (talk) 15:38, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Since Dough is on vacation, I revived the link through http://www.archive.org/ on his behalf.  Imzadi 1979  →   15:51, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I have passed the article.--Dom497 (talk) 17:57, 21 June 2012 (UTC)