Talk:U.S. Route 2 in Michigan/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Dough 48  72  01:08, 20 April 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

 I will place the article on hold for a few fixes.  Dough 48  72  01:08, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The sentence "In the 1980s, the highway was truncated, removed from the I-75 freeway resulting in today's basic form" sounds awkward. Mystery Spot links to an unrelated spot in California, can this be fixed? "the western extension to the state line was shifted to a location by 1952." sounds a little confusing.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Citation needed for "The business route was previously a full loop that ran west through downtown Ironwood and crossed the border into Hurley and back up to US 2. The Wisconsin Department of Transportation has removed the signage on their side of the border, which has meant that the route is currently a business spur that ends at the border."
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * "US 2/US 141 exit downtown and turn east along a second retail corridor near the mall.", what is the name of the mall? Is there a reason why CR 426 is included in the major intersections table?
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I will now pass the article.  Dough 48  72  02:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)