Talk:U.S. Route 33 in Michigan/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 02:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

 A couple minor concerns, but otherwise good. Will put on hold.  Dough   4872   03:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * In the first sentence you should mention Berrien County is in Michigan (just to make sure to mention the state in the first sentence of prose).
 * "According Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT), the agency that maintained the roadway, for the last year it was US 33,", should clearly indicate what specific year this is.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * A map and an image of the former route would be nice, but not required to pass GAN.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * A map and an image of the former route would be nice, but not required to pass GAN.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Both minor items have been addressed, .  Imzadi 1979  →   03:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I will pass the article. Congrats on another GA!  Dough   4872   03:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)