Talk:U.S. Route 59 in Oklahoma/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 12:31, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

I will get to this later today or tomorrow.  Imzadi 1979  →   12:31, 12 June 2013 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

DABs and ELs look good.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I have just two prose comments listed below.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * I'd like to see more photos, but that doesn't impact the listing of the article. The map should have a caption though, I think.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * There's just a pair of comments that are possibly more like personal writing preferences.  Imzadi 1979  →   02:09, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see more photos, but that doesn't impact the listing of the article. The map should have a caption though, I think.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * There's just a pair of comments that are possibly more like personal writing preferences.  Imzadi 1979  →   02:09, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Prose comments
 * Constructions like "US-59 / 270 head" seem awkward, because I read that as a single highway with a combined name. If it were "US-59 and US-70 head" that would work to me, but otherwise that's one name, so a singular subject.
 * "interchanging" as a verb doesn't work right, because it the traditional definition of the verb, the two highways would be changing places. I'd stick to something like "meets" or even "junctions".
 * I have addressed both of these concerns. You may want to double-check that I didn't miss any of the awkward slashed constructions, however. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 02:36, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * And listed.  Imzadi 1979  →   02:59, 14 June 2013 (UTC)