Talk:U.S. Route 67 in Iowa/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jgera5 (talk · contribs) 16:38, 17 March 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A (prose):
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * For a relatively short article, it is very well-sourced.
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This article is fairly stable, is well-sourced, and very well-written. My only complaint is that it could use one or two more images. But overall, I would say that this is definitely a good article. Jgera5 (talk) 16:38, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This article is fairly stable, is well-sourced, and very well-written. My only complaint is that it could use one or two more images. But overall, I would say that this is definitely a good article. Jgera5 (talk) 16:38, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This article is fairly stable, is well-sourced, and very well-written. My only complaint is that it could use one or two more images. But overall, I would say that this is definitely a good article. Jgera5 (talk) 16:38, 17 March 2012 (UTC)