Talk:U.S. Route 6 in Iowa/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 04:17, 9 September 2013 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

ELs and DABs look good.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Looks good after a few tweaks.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Good here.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Good here.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Good here.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Good here.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * No photos (which is a shame, but not a requirement), but I note that the map should have its GIS source(s) indicated by the creator. The map should have a caption added.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Final verdict is a pass. The minor issue over the map won't withhold passage.  Imzadi 1979  →   02:37, 10 September 2013 (UTC)