Talk:UAS Laboratories

Proposed deletion objected to
This article is not promotional in form, it is factual in tone. If it is promotional, it can only be in having an article about a non-notable firm. But I think that the sources already cited provide sufficient, if marginal, notability. The author claims that significant additional grounds for notability can be added given time -- the author states that he is new to Wikipedia. See User talk:DESiegel. I have been working with the primary author on this article. I ask for some time to get this into better shape.

As for the issue of conflict of interest, that is not, IMO, generally a deletion reason. The primary author may well have a conflict of interest, this is not clear. But his editing seems free of the worst problems that COI editing can cause, at least. DES (talk) 20:37, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

I have therefore removed the PROD template, in accord with the proposed deletion procedure. DES (talk) 20:40, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

This article is written in neutral tone for public use. I have no connections with this company.(Gutflora (talk) 05:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC))