Talk:USS Bennington (PG-4)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Below is my review of the article:


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I couldn't find a single sloppy sentence except this: 'the final tally of the dead was one officer and sixty-five men dead'. Not too happy with it. Please consider rewording.
 * I changed it to "the final death toll was one officer and sixty-five men" — Bellhalla (talk) 10:45, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:




 * The article is written brilliantly. Thanks for a nice read. Nothing else to say. - DSachan (talk) 09:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review and the kind words. — Bellhalla (talk) 10:45, 28 April 2009 (UTC)