Talk:USS Chickasaw (1864)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 09:25, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

I'll take this one. Will crank it up shortly. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 09:25, 16 March 2013 (UTC) Comments Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 10:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * suggest you add the year the wreck was discovered to the lead.
 * Good idea.
 * for context, suggest you explain that the ship was built on the Mississippi for those of us not from the US, and also whether Mound City is north/upstream or south/downstream from St Louis.
 * It's on the Ohio, added.
 * suggest "its return fire " should be "the return fire".
 * Done
 * suggest "On 15–17 August" be "Between/During 15–17 August".
 * Done
 * the bolding in the Official Records listed in the References section seem incongruous. Could you address?
 * That's part of the template's formatting for volumes of a series.
 * no dabs, no reflinks, no issues with redirects, copyvio all green = no action action required
 * Checklinks shows the Official Records Vol 21 as a "likely dead" external link.
 * Fixed.
 * gently suggest you add alt text to the infobox image per WP:ALTTEXT. Not strictly required at GA.
 * suggest you convert all 10 digit isbns to 13 digit per WP:ISBN. Not strictly required at GA.
 * 10 digit ISBNs are still valid and searchable on Worldcat, so there's no need to convert them.
 * Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:55, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * A pleasure. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 01:08, 17 March 2013 (UTC)