Talk:USS Idaho (BB-42)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 00:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * No DABs
 * One dead link.
 * Removed
 * Images appropriately licensed.
 * One duplicate link.
 * Fixed
 * Link main (gun) battery, aircraft catapult, Iceland
 * Done
 * mounts were true three-gun barrels huh? I'd just say that unlike earlier turrets, each gun could elevate independently
 * How does "Unlike earlier American battleships with triple turrets, these mounts allowed each barrel to elevate independently" work for you?
 * Explain /50 notation. Should probably add Mark #s as well.
 * Added a note.
 * Provide Imperial conversions for Bofors and Oerlikon guns
 * Done
 * after completing fitting-out work awkward
 * How about "and after fitting-out work ended"?
 * Shortly after commissioning too close usages of commissioning. Try "shortly afterward", ...
 * Done
 * Don't think that Naval Review should be capitalized.
 * Good catch
 * I'd delete the little bit about her reconstruction in the career section and add what wasn't already covered in the modification section to the modification section.
 * That's a good idea
 * Harold Rainsford Stark Don't really think that we need his middle name
 * Good point
 * transferred Idaho, the battleships Mississippi and New Mexico her sisters
 * Done
 * 5-inch (127 mm)/51 cal. already told us metric conversion--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Fixed
 * Don't forget about the ampersand in the references.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:07, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Done. Thanks Sturm. Parsecboy (talk) 13:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)