Talk:USS Jacob Jones (DD-61)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Below is my review:


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 54.6 km/h and 56 km/h in the infobox make a lot of difference in maximum speed.
 * The figure in the infobox and the "Design and construction" section was the correct one; I updated the figure in the lead to match. — Bellhalla (talk) 17:29, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:




 * A nice article. Thanks - DSachan (talk) 14:27, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review! — Bellhalla (talk) 17:29, 15 May 2009 (UTC)