Talk:USS Missouri (SSN-780)

Article improvements
You took out a section on this stub article and now have mixed history with current. Something that happened on 26 January 2018 could be considered recent "history" but if the submarine is now stationed at the port it is "current" information. I get a little confused when a stub article seems to be under some "protection" when added content certainly can't harm the article. Is there a concern with just keeping the articles as stubs? Otr500 (talk) 07:51, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * This has nothing to do with being a stub or being under any kind of protection. There is just no need for that sub-heading or section. Basically, everything that happens during the service life of a ship or boat is part of It's "history". Only the most recent event would be considered current, and that's only while it is actually "current" or actively occurring. If you look at other ship article's they don't, or shouldn't, have a "current" section. It would have to be moved everytime there is a new entry. Besides, all entries are dated, making such a section/sub-heading redundant. Please note the other corrections I made to your edit as well. Thanks - the WOLF  child  16:02, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Being fucked up by "Marshal Shaposhnikov" on 02.12.22.