Talk:USS Ohio (BB-12)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 23:22, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Grabbing this for a review over the weekend. Miyagawa (talk) 23:22, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Criteria
 Good Article Status - Review Criteria   		A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ; and
 * (c).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Review
 <li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>.</li>

<li>.</li> <li>:</li>

</ol>

Discussion

 * Lead
 * Is it worth specifying that she was a dreadnought battleship, or is that inherent from her armament? (That query goes for the description too)
 * A good idea - it would be obvious to someone familiar with the subject area, but it would be best to link since most readers will not be familiar.
 * Description
 * Is there a reason why you've linked two types of gun, but not the other?
 * Just an omission - good catch.
 * Service history
 * Per WP:OVERLINK you might want to check the links to some of those cities.
 * Fixed.
 * Other than that very minor niggle and the two queries, I think that's it. Always a pleasure to read your articles. Miyagawa (talk) 08:20, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your thorough review! Parsecboy (talk) 14:15, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Great, happy for this one to receive its GA symbol! Miyagawa (talk) 14:24, 4 July 2015 (UTC)