Talk:USS Ozark (1863)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 08:56, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

: After a couple of punctuational adjustments, I feel the article complies with MOS guidelines on prose and layout. Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... (talk) 21:06, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article frequently cites several applied reputable sources. Nothing appears to be original research. Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... (talk) 21:06, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: The article satisfactorily covers all basic aspects of encyclopedic information on the topic. Nothing included seems trivial or otherwise unneeded. Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... (talk) 21:06, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. The article shows no bias towards or against the subject. Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... (talk) 21:06, 26 February 2013 (UTC) . The immediately-seen revision history goes back to 2006, and no evidence of an edit war is shown. Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... (talk) 20:44, 26 February 2013 (UTC) : The article uses a single image which is public domain, and is relevant to the article because it portrays the topic. Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... (talk) 20:44, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

After some minor tweaking outlined in the "Prose" check, I feel that this article qualifies for inclusion with the "War and military" GAs. Congratulations! Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... (talk) 21:08, 26 February 2013 (UTC)