Talk:USS Sargent Bay/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 05:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Criteria
1. Well-written
 * Prose is clear, concise, and understandable, with proper spelling and grammar ✅
 * Lead ✅
 * Layout The section for USS Sargent Bay is only two sentences long.  It would be good to expand this section, although I understand that may not be entirely possible.  This section could also be consolidated. ✅
 * Links Some article links, such as Operation Magic Carpet are linked in the article multiple times.  Generally links should only be used in the first appearance of the topic in an article (not counting the infobox).  Also, the redlink to William Theodore Rassieur should probably be dealt with. ✅
 * Buzzwords ✅
 * Fiction ✅ not an issue with this topic
 * Lists ✅ not applicable

2. Verifiable
 * List of references properly formatted It looks like refs 5 and 8 should be consolidated into a single named ref, since they appear to be quoting the same page of the same book. ✅
 * Inline citations from reliable sources . Can you add inline citations to the various dates in the infobox for verifiability?  The dates are cited in the article so it's not a big deal, but having citations there would be nice.
 * Content cited in article, not big deal.
 * No original research ✅ (none that I can detect).
 * No COPYVIO ✅ I tested several sentences throughout the article, and they came up clean.

3. Broad in coverage
 * Covers main aspects ✅ Design, construction, and service history properly detailed.
 * Stays focused on topic ✅

4. Neutral ✅

5. Stable ✅

6. Illustrated if possible
 * Media tagged for copyright details ✅ All media tagged as public domain.
 * Media relevant ✅
 * I've responded to your points. Stikkyy t/c 06:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Issues mentioned have been addressed. Good job, User:Stikkyy.