Talk:USS Tarawa (CV-40)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Llammakey (talk · contribs) 19:41, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: The history of the ship is only partially here. As an aircraft carrier, one expects to see information about the aircraft that flew from the ship and which units the ship embarked. Too much of the vessel's history is missing, let alone key info like flight deck size. Suggest adding the required info and re-applying for GA. Other nitpicks are abbreviations are not consistent within article and words the need to be linked, such as knots, are not.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: The history of the ship is only partially here. As an aircraft carrier, one expects to see information about the aircraft that flew from the ship and which units the ship embarked. Too much of the vessel's history is missing, let alone key info like flight deck size. Suggest adding the required info and re-applying for GA. Other nitpicks are abbreviations are not consistent within article and words the need to be linked, such as knots, are not.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: The history of the ship is only partially here. As an aircraft carrier, one expects to see information about the aircraft that flew from the ship and which units the ship embarked. Too much of the vessel's history is missing, let alone key info like flight deck size. Suggest adding the required info and re-applying for GA. Other nitpicks are abbreviations are not consistent within article and words the need to be linked, such as knots, are not.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail: